Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-04-10 |
| -- | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.9 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 437 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A40 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, getting a global score of 79.6 against 73.4. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A40 has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. Galaxy A40 has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy A40 counts with an incredibly better display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a bit smaller screen. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera, a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher (4K) video definition.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.