Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-05-15 |
| -- | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 431 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 has a global score of 81.7, which is better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 general score. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A41 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. Galaxy A41 has a much better display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little smaller display.
Galaxy A41 features a much better performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A41, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a higher resolution back camera and a bigger aperture.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy A41, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a very superior battery performance than Galaxy A41, because it has a 71 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.