Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2017-01-13 |
| -- | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 424 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, having a 75.8 score against 73.4. Galaxy A5 (2017) features a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) features a much better display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a much smaller display.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 100% larger battery size.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a lot higher (4K) video resolution, a camera with way more megapixels and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.