Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-10-20 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, getting an 86.6 score against 73.4. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A50s has older 10 version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features a much sharper display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little bit smaller screen. Galaxy A50s features a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 50 percent more battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro shoots clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a more megapixels back facing camera, a lot larger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.