Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-12-27 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 score. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has 11 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. The Galaxy A51 has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Galaxy A51 has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a bit smaller display. Galaxy A51 has a slightly better memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has a 6000mAh battery size. Motorola Edge 60 Pro takes slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a higher resolution back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.