Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-04-29 |
| -- | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a lot better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, having a 90.8 score against 73.4. These phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a way better display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a bit smaller display. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a much bigger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures, a larger aperture to take better low light photos and video and a more mega-pixels back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with greater battery life than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 33% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.