Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2021-03-17 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is much better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 general score. Galaxy A52 counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a quite smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 has a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a same size aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.