Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2021-09-01 |
| -- | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is a lot better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's score of 73.4. These phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. Galaxy A52s features a lot better looking display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a quite smaller display.
Galaxy A52s counts with more memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A52s, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52s captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting worse quality photos, and they both have the same camera aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.