Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-05-22 |
| -- | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| -- | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 294 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A6 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, with a 75.8 score against 73.4. The Galaxy A6 counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a quite smaller screen. Galaxy A6 has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A6, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a very superior battery life than Galaxy A6, because it has a 100 percent more battery size.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a way larger sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and a back facing camera with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.