Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2017-01-13 |
| -- | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 386 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2017) is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, having a 75.8 score against 73.4. Galaxy A7 (2017)'s design weights the same than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, but it is a lot thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) has a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy A7 (2017) has a much better looking screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a bit smaller screen. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a way bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a much better battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a back camera with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.