Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-04-26 |
| -- | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a score of 76.9, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro's overall score of 73.4. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A70 has the older 10 version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. Galaxy A70 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. They have a display of the same size.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy A70 features just a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with longer battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.