Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-07-16 |
| -- | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, with a 92.9 score against 73.4. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. They have a screen of the same size.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same aperture and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a greater storage to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.