Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-01-06 |
| -- | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| -- | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 441 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) has a global score of 79.2, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro's general score of 73.4. Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) features a much sharper display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little smaller screen. The Galaxy A8 (2018) features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 60 Pro takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way better video definition and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 100% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.