Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-10-16 |
| -- | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F41 is better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, having a global score of 85.2 against 73.4. These devices include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy F41 has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. The Samsung Galaxy F41 features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy F41 features a lot better display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a bit smaller display and much less brightness. The Galaxy F41 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and images, and they both have a same size aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy F41, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Galaxy F41 counts with a battery duration that is just as good as Motorola Edge 60 Pro's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.