Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2021-02-22 |
| -- | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is way better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's overall score of 73.4. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy F62 has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores (although faster).
Galaxy F62 features a much better looking screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has much worse brightness, they both have a same size display. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy F62 features improved battery performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because it has a 17 percent bigger battery size. The Galaxy F62 features just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 64 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.