Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-09-27 |
| -- | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| -- | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 362 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, having a 97.6 score against 73.4. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version, counting with a couple additional features. The Galaxy Fold features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because it has a little bit bigger screen.
Galaxy Fold has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Fold has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is worse for taking photos and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and a much bigger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 6000mAh battery size instead of 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.