Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-02-05 |
| -- | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 409 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 has a global score of 78.9, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 global score. The Galaxy M20 is a way thicker phone than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, but both of them have equal weights. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Galaxy M20 has the previous 10 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version.
Galaxy M20 counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a quite smaller screen. Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy M20, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and video, a much better resolution back camera and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.