Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is way better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 score. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 8 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features an incredibly better screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. Both have a same size screen.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera and faster video frame rate.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because it has more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.