Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| -- | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 494 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is much better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro's score of 73.4. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because it has a bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a better camera than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a lot higher video quality and a camera with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 33% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.