Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2013-09-04 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 386 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 7.52 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 global score. These phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. The Galaxy Note 3 has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional GPU.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a way better screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little smaller display. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a back camera with a way higher resolution, a larger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low light situations and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a very superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has an 88% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.