Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 5.1 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2015-08-13 |
| -- | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 5 is a bit better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, having a score of 79.3 against 73.4. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 5 has an older 5.1 version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has less RAM memory and less processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a way better looking display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little bit smaller screen. Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a superior camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture, a back camera with a way better resolution and a much larger back camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.