Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2017-07-07 |
| -- | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, having a score of 80.4 against 73.4. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a lot better looking screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a bit smaller screen.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution and a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality pictures.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.