Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-08-23 |
| -- | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 400 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, with an 89 score against 73.4. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a much sharper screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little bit smaller screen. The Galaxy Note10 has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy Note10 has as much storage for applications and games as the Motorola Edge 60 Pro one, both of them have equal internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.