Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-01-21 |
| -- | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite has an overall score of 86.2, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's global score of 73.4. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note10 Lite has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a much better display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. Both have a display with the same size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy Note10 Lite has a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with longer battery life than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a way larger sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality and a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.