Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2013-09-25 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 386 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, with a 77.7 score against 73.4. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note3 has the newer 4.4.2 version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a much better screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a bit smaller screen.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note3 features an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro captures way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a camera in the back with a way better 50 MP resolution, a lot bigger back camera sensor and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and video.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has an 88% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.