Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2014-09-29 |
| -- | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note4 has a global score of 77.6, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's global score of 73.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 counts with an incredibly better screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a bit smaller screen.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note4, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3220mAh.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited environments, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs and a camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.