Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-24 | 2017-09-15 |
| -- | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 522 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note8 is much better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, with an 83 score against 73.4. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note8 has newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. The Galaxy Note8 has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy Note8 counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a quite smaller screen. Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note8, because it has an 82% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.