Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-03-08 |
| -- | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| -- | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 551 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is way better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, getting an 88.3 score against 73.4. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S10 has older 11 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. The Galaxy S10 has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy S10 features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little bit smaller display. Galaxy S10 counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.