Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-05-16 |
| -- | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 502 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, having a score of 93.6 against 73.4. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S10 5G has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. Both of them have 8 cores and a 8 GB RAM.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. They have a screen of the same size. The Galaxy S10 5G's memory capacity for games and applications is just as good as the Motorola Edge 60 Pro one, both of them have the same internal memory. Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with better battery duration than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with much more MP and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.