Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-02-03 |
| -- | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a score of 89.7, which is a lot better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 global score. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's design weights the same than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, but it's noticeably thicker. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a much sharper display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. Both of them have a display of the same size.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with greater battery life than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite captures clearer videos and photos than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a camera with less megapixels resolution, a worse 3840x2160 video quality, a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video and a much tinier camera sensor providing a lot lower image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.