Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-03-08 |
| -- | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| -- | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 435 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is much better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, having an 86.3 score against 73.4. Galaxy S10e has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little bit smaller screen. Galaxy S10e features a bit more memory for apps and games than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 94 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking images in poorly lited environments and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a lot bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.