Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| -- | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 566 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is a lot better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 overall score. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 has an older 13 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. The Galaxy S20 features a lot better display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little bit smaller display.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a quite bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels, a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos and better 30 frames per second video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 6000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.