Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-10-02 |
| -- | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, having a 90.8 score against 73.4. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a bit smaller display.
The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.