Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| -- | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| -- | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 509 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, getting a 98 score against 73.4. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because it has a quite bigger display.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has a way tinier sensor shooting way lower quality images, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a lot higher resolution camera and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.