Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2021-01-29 |
| -- | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Phantom black and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| -- | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 516 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is a lot better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, with a 98.1 score against 73.4. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. The Galaxy S21 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has much less brightness, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
Galaxy S21 Ultra has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features much more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S21 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S21 Ultra takes much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.