Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2022-02-25 |
| -- | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| -- | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 501 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro's score of 73.4. Both devices we are comparing here use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better looking display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has much less brightness, it also counts with a quite larger display.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 8 GB of RAM. Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 60 Pro features superior battery duration than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 20% greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a superior camera than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger sensor providing a higher image quality, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.