Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2014-06-23 |
| -- | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Blue and Red |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 432 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 7.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 7.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Sport is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, with a 77.8 score against 73.4. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S5 Sport has the newer 4.4.2 version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has less CPU cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional GPU.
Galaxy S5 Sport features a way better screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a really smaller display. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 6000mAh battery size. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a much more mega pixels camera, a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.