Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2016-03-11 |
| -- | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 576 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, with a score of 79.5 against 73.4. The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has 4 less cores and 4 GB less RAM. The Galaxy S7 counts with a lot better looking display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a lot smaller screen and much darker display.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro captures a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a way better 50 megapixels resolution back camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.