Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2016-06-10 |
| -- | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 576 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, having a score of 75.8 against 73.4. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores (but faster). Galaxy S7 Active counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has way less brightness and a really smaller display.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a very superior battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.