Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2025-04-24 | 2016-03-11 |
| -- | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 534 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge is slightly better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, with a 78.1 score against 73.4. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S7 edge has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM.
Galaxy S7 edge features a way better display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a bit smaller screen. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a much better battery life than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.