Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2017-04-21 |
| -- | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 568 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, getting a global score of 81.7 against 73.4. The Galaxy S8 features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy S8 has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little smaller display.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a very superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy S8, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 60 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photos.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S8, because it has a 100% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.