Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2017-08-11 |
| -- | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 568 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 Active has a score of 81.9, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 score. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a much sharper display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little smaller screen.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 60 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a lot larger camera sensor capturing way better quality pictures and a way more MP camera.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 50% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.