Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-03-16 |
| -- | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 568 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 score. Galaxy S9 has a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S9 has a much sharper display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a bit smaller display.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a much better battery performance than Galaxy S9, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 50 MP resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.