Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-04-04 |
| -- | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | -- |
| -- | 576 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 global score. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a lot smaller display. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels, a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.