Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| -- | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 409 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is much better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 global score. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a bit smaller display.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. Galaxy XCover Pro has a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4050mAh. Motorola Edge 60 Pro takes greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light captures and video, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.