Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-02-14 |
| -- | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 425 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is a lot better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 overall score. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. Galaxy Z Flip has a way better display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. Both have a display with the same size.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with as much memory for games and applications as Motorola Edge 60 Pro, both of them have equal internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount. Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega pixels and a way bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.