Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-08-07 |
| -- | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 425 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, getting a 92.3 score against 73.4. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much more vibrant display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. Both have a screen with the same size.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro and Galaxy Z Flip 5G feature quite similar storage capacity to store more apps and games, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has an 82% bigger battery size. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a much bigger camera sensor taking way better quality pictures and videos and a way better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.