Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-09-18 |
| -- | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| -- | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 372 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is way better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro's score of 73.4. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because it has a bit bigger display. Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a larger camera sensor and a back camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy Z Fold 2's storage for games and applications is very similar to the Motorola Edge 60 Pro one, both of them have the same internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.