Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-05-08 |
| -- | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has an overall score of 86.6, which is much better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro's overall score of 73.4. These phones use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has 10 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. They have a display with the same size. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has a smaller sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has superior battery life than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a 27 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.