Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | Android 11 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2021-03-29 |
| -- | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| -- | Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| -- | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| -- | 516 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is way better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro's overall score of 73.4. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has much more opaque screen, it also counts with a little larger screen. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a much smaller back-facing camera sensor providing a way worse image quality, and they both have a 50 MP resolution camera, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also counts with a way higher video definition.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has as much storage for games and applications as Motorola Edge 60 Pro, they have equal internal storage. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro features longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.